Published 2025-12-19
Keywords
- Eros, Awareness, Aesthetic Field, Field Theory, Phenomenology, Transformation, Contact, Gestalt Therapy.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Vakhtang Kezheradze
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Moments of therapeutic change often emerge subtly within the relational atmosphere – through shifts in breath, silence, or embodied resonance. Understanding these transformations requires attending to the shared organism-environment field rather than to individual intrapsychic processes. Grounded in Gestalt field theory and informed by a phenomenological stance, this brief research report introduces the Transformational Field Model (TFM), a descriptive framework identifying five recurring textures of transformation: concealment, containment, symbolization, integration, and stillness. Three clinical vignettes illustrate how these textures become discernible through embodied and relational cues in psychotherapy. Across clinical situations of groundlessness, inhibition of Eros, and prolonged grief, change emerged when the therapeutic field could hold vulnerability without prematurely defining or directing it. The TFM supports clinicians in cultivating field sensibility and recognizing qualitative shifts through which awareness moves toward contact, offering a phenomenologically precise vocabulary for the micro-movements of transformation.
References
- Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper.
- Perls, F.S., Hefferline, R.F., & Goodman, P. (1951). Gestalt Therapy: Excitement and Growth in the Human Personality. New York: Julian Press.
- Parlett, M. (1991). Reflections on field theory. British Gestalt Journal, 1(2), 69–81.
- Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
- Francesetti, G. (2019). The Aesthetic Dimension of Psychotherapy: The Aesthetic Field and the Clinical Situation. London: Routledge.
- Spagnuolo Lobb, M. (2017). From losses of ego functions to the dance steps between psychotherapist and client: Phenomenology and aesthetics of contact in the psychotherapeutic field. British Gestalt Journal, 26(1), 28–37.
- Spagnuolo Lobb, M. (2018). Aesthetic relational knowledge of the field: A revised concept of awareness in Gestalt therapy and contemporary psychiatry. Gestalt Review, 22(1), 50–68.
- Robine, J.-M. (Ed.). (2016). Self: A Polyphony of Contemporary Gestalt Therapists. St. Romain-la-Virvée, France: L’Exprimerie.
- Francesetti, G., & Roubal, J. (2020). Field theory in contemporary Gestalt therapy. Part 1: Modulating the therapist’s presence in clinical practice. Gestalt Review, 24(2), 113–136.
- Francesetti, P. (2016). Phenomenological research in Gestalt therapy: The clinical situation as an observational field. Quaderni di Gestalt, 29(1), 65–84.
- Spagnuolo Lobb, M. (2013). The Now-for-Next in Psychotherapy: Gestalt Therapy Recounts Itself. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
- Francesetti, G. (2019). Psychopathology of the present moment: A field perspective. Psychopathology Review, 6(2).
- Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Fuchs, T. (2017). Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16, 1–24.